Two Lists Of Ten, Two Hundred And Fifty-Six Apart
Hold the length fixed at ten items and the intake still ranges over a factor of two hundred and fifty-six. Length constrains almost nothing.
Reference
Fifty notes on what a list of requirements admits
Length
Two lists of the same length can differ by a factor of two hundred and fifty-six.
Part three
Hold the length fixed at ten items and the intake still ranges over a factor of two hundred and fifty-six. Length constrains almost nothing.
Reference
At every length the widest shape has the same form: as few compulsory items as possible and a threshold of none. What it looks like, and why it is so common.
Reference
The narrowest shape at every length admits exactly one profile. Eighty-one shapes in this record do, and they are not all the same length.
Reference
The spread between the widest and narrowest list at a given length doubles up to eight items and then stops at two hundred and fifty-six. Why it flattens.
Reference
Forty-five distinct filters can be built from eight lines. The count of shapes at each length, where it peaks, and what it says about reading a list.
Reference
Length is the first thing a reader perceives about a list and nearly the last thing that decides what it admits. That gap is where the misreading happens.
Analysis
Three compulsory items admit one profile in eight. Eight optional items requiring three admit two hundred and nineteen in two hundred and fifty-six.
Analysis
Lists get written to a target number of lines far more often than to a target selectivity. The arithmetic of what that produces, and the alternative.
Analysis